The Deception of “Religious Tolerance”

1/15/06

 

 

Mark Lawson speaks to Hollywood movie star John Travolta, a high profile member of the Church of Scientology, about his beliefs and his faith.

 

ML: A question we always ask is do you believe in God? Is that an appropriate question to a Scientologist?

JT: Sure. Let’s put it this way, I think the whole idea of Scientology is to think for yourself. And that’s really what Mr. Hubbard wanted. It’s not for you to think necessarily like anyone else but what you think is right for you, what you think is appropriate for you. If you ask me personally, I think yes there’s God. But each day through a lot of the studying that I do, I think I get to understand, possibly, what God is about but I don’t think I fully get the picture yet.

ML: Do you pray?

JT: Yes, I have prayed, it’s not a very regular habit, but if I’m concentrating on something I really want to go well. I probably do my own version of it, it is not anything to do with Scientology, it’s something I like and enjoy, maybe it’s a carry over from Catholicism.

ML: Who or what would you be praying to?

JT: To the yet not fully understood God concept.

ML: I’ve read in terms of Scientology accounts of healing experiences that you have been involved in, is that right?

JT: There are several "Assists", that is the name of the program, and these are different depending on what is wrong with the person, they just help the person heal quicker. By getting in communication with their body, I do use them because I can and I know how they work and I know that they do work. To date I have never failed helping a person feel better at least.

ML: You healed a British rock star?

JT: Yes, Sting, that was in Canada and he was under the weather he had a sore throat and flu symptoms or something. I think I did two or three different types of "Assists" and he felt better.

 

ML: What does Scientology say about what happens after death?

JT: I think that the body ends and you as a spirit go on. It’s up to you what you are going to do.

ML: Is that reincarnation?

JT: It could be if that is what you chose to do. You want to get back into another body or if you just want to hang out, whatever you feel like.

ML: Do you believe in reincarnation?

JT: Yes, I do, absolutely, I don’t even believe I just know that it’s the truth.

ML: Do you think you have lived before. And do you have any sense of what those lives were?

JT: No, and I wouldn’t tell you. No, it think that is so personal. I also think you have to be so careful when you talk about concepts like this, it’s not real for everyone.

 

A term that you will be hearing more and more is “Religious Tolerance.”

 

It sounds good.  Sounds very compassionate.  Yet it is the driving force behind the bigotry and intolerance towards Christianity!

 

2 Cor. 11:13 For such men are false apostles, deceitful workmen, masquerading as apostles of Christ. 14And no wonder, for Satan himself masquerades as an angel of light. 15It is not surprising, then, if his servants masquerade as servants of righteousness. Their end will be what their actions deserve.

 

1 Thess. 5:1 Now, brothers, about times and dates we do not need to write to you, 2for you know very well that the day of the Lord will come like a thief in the night. 3While people are saying, “Peace and safety,” destruction will come on them suddenly, as labor pains on a pregnant woman, and they will not escape.

 

The world's idea of "Peace and Safety" is a social system that totally rejects Jesus Christ.

 

1 Jo. 4:1 Dear friends, do not believe every spirit, but test the spirits to see whether they are from God, because many false prophets have gone out into the world. 2This is how you can recognize the Spirit of God: Every spirit that acknowledges that Jesus Christ has come in the flesh is from God, 3but every spirit that does not acknowledge Jesus is not from God. This is the spirit of the antichrist, which you have heard is coming and even now is already in the world.

 

I want to read to you the stand that promoters of “Religious Tolerance” take.  But before I read this, understand that two of the most powerful groups of influence in this country are also the biggest promoters of “Religious Tolerance”--the liberal media and Hollywood.

 

“If a person considers their religion's ethic of reciprocity to be of paramount importance, then they will want others to enjoy freedom of religion, speech, assembly, and other basic freedoms. They will give the highest priority to fundamental human rights, as listed in the United Nations' Universal Declaration of Human Rights and other documents. They will be religiously tolerant, even of those who believe differently.

 

But many religious leaders promote hatred and restrictions of fundamental human rights, targeting the followers of other religions, sexual minorities, women, etc. The Bible itself contains many passages promoting intolerance. If people give greater importance to these teachings than to the ethic of reciprocity, the result is religious intolerance. We see the results throughout the world, including intolerance:

 

Ÿ         Within a religion: In Northern Ireland, Roman Catholics and Protestants have assassinated thousands of followers of each other's faith groups.

Ÿ         By Christians: In Bosnia, Serbian Orthodox Christians committed genocide against Muslims.

Ÿ         By Muslims: In East Timor Muslims committed crimes against humanity.

 

In North America, religious intolerance still exists, but it tends to take a non-lethal form:

Statements by Rep. Bob Barr and George Bush that Wiccans should not enjoy the same religious rights as others on army bases.

 

Ÿ         Wicca: religious practice involving nature-worship and witchcraft

 

Religiously based campaigns mounted by religious groups to limit or reduce the rights of gays and lesbians.

 

Religious tolerance can only be enhanced when religions, governments, schools, agencies etc. emphasize ethics of reciprocity and fundamental human rights to a much greater degree than has been done in the past. Hopefully, individual members will be motivated to detect intolerance and discrimination within their own faith groups and either work for improvement, or leave.

 

This is the influence that has swayed some Christian denominations into this type of thinking.

 

In 1997, the Disciples of Christ urged the enactment of "legislation on local, state and national levels which will end the denial of civil rights and the violation of civil liberties for reasons of sexual orientation."

 

The resolution specifically recognized that "the church, among other elements of society, has contributed to the persecution and suffering of homosexuals, and it is its responsibility in this regard which provides one reason for seeking a more enlightened understanding."

 

“Gay, Lesbian & Affirming Disciples", (GLAD) is a support group for gay and lesbian members and their supporters within the denomination. Their goal is "full dignity and integrity of gay, lesbian, bisexual and affirming people within the Christian Church (Disciples of Christ)."

 

Other denominations, either at the national or local level, are considering ordination of -- or have decided to ordain -- openly homosexual clergy. That is the case with the Evangelical Lutheran Church of America, the African Methodist Episcopal Church, the Presbyterian Church USA, the American Baptist Church, and the United Church of Christ.

 

Advocates of “Religious Tolerance” further say........

 

Racism has become socially unacceptable in many circles. So as sexism. It appears to be just a matter of time before homophobia will be seen as a form of hatred that is as evil as racism and sexism. But religious intolerance, appears to be well entrenched. It will not be dissipating in the near future.

 

Rather than condemn opposing beliefs, some advocate tolerance toward them.

Instead of fighting abortion, some suggest tolerance towards pro-choice advocates.

Instead of resisting physician assisted suicide, some recommend allowing others to make up their own mind.”

 

George A. Boyd a very strong advocate of religious tolerance writes....

 

“Imagine for one moment that the Spirit of the Lord is walking in the cool of the morning. Suddenly, He/She/It spies a glistening human soul. He/She/It patiently pads over to it and flips it over. "A cross!" God exclaims, "Better keep this one!"

 

Then, from another part of the garden, an arc of rainbow light catches the Creator's eye. Beneath a dew-laden cabbage leaf, another human soul is hiding. Again the Creator walks over to gently inspect this new soul. Flipping it over, He/She/It finds the Hindu AUM symbol. "Bah! No good...wrong kind!" God thunders. Taking the little soul in an extended thumb and forefinger, a flick of the Divine wrist sends the little soul into a compost heap at the edge of Eden's garden.

 

In our irreverent anthropomorphic fantasy, we have looked through the lens of a parable that typifies the worldview of many of our Christian evangelists. It seems to matter to humans what spiritual club they belong to—we are quick to inspect the bright blue underbelly of other souls to make sure their conception of theology, correct belief and morality fit our own.”

 

Mat. 7:13 “Enter through the narrow gate. For wide is the gate and broad is the road that leads to destruction, and many enter through it. 14But small is the gate and narrow the road that leads to life, and only a few find it.

 

Jo. 14:6 Jesus answered, “I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me.

 

Acts 4:8 Then Peter, filled with the Holy Spirit, said to them: “Rulers and elders of the people! 9If we are being called to account today for an act of kindness shown to a cripple and are asked how he was healed, 10then know this, you and all the people of Israel: It is by the name of Jesus Christ of Nazareth, whom you crucified but whom God raised from the dead, that this man stands before you healed. 11He is

     “‘the stone you builders rejected,

       which has become the capstone.’

12Salvation is found in no one else, for there is no other name under heaven given to men by which we must be saved.”

 

When our son Matt and his wife were home for Christmas, he told me that I would not believe the amount of churches in the Washington D.C. area that water down the gospel.

 

1 Jo. 2:18 Dear children, this is the last hour; and as you have heard that the antichrist is coming, even now many antichrists have come.

 

1 Jo. 2:22 Who is the liar? It is the man who denies that Jesus is the Christ. Such a man is the antichrist—he denies the Father and the Son. 23No one who denies the Son has the Father; whoever acknowledges the Son has the Father also.

 

 

Don Feder is a former Boston Herald writer who is now a political/communications consultant.

 

DON FEDER

 

Why Hollywood hates Christianity

 

 May 28, 2004

 

· The Last Temptation of Christ (1988) – wherein Jesus is given a fantasy sex life.

 

· Priest (1994) – a good, homosexual priest battles "repression" in his Church and heterosexual incest.

 

· Dogma (1999) – another reputed comedy, wherein an abortion clinic worker (the perfect heroine, from Hollywood’s perspective) and the great-grand-niece of Jesus (?) saves the world from destruction by fallen angels trying to enter a church to reenter Heaven. Don’t ask. When it comes to an opportunity to bash Christians, no plot is too ridiculous.

 

· The Magdalene Sisters (2003) – set in a convent school run by nuns who could pass as concentration-camp guards.

 

· The Order (2003) – teen heartthrob Heath Ledger battles yet another secret order within the Roman Catholic Church bent on no-good.

 

· Stigmata (1999) – the entire Roman Catholic Church is shown to be hiding the "real" Gospel, and a priest tries to murder its last true disciple.

 

· The Saint (1997) – frequently, anti-Christian characterizations bear little or no relation to a movie’s plot. They are gratuitous, but damaging nonetheless. This movie opens in a Far Eastern orphanage run by a brutal priest who beats and starves the children and is responsible for the death of one of his charges.

 

The above only skims the surface of Hollywood’s anti-Christian crusade. As they do in so many areas, movies shape popular attitudes and perceptions here as well.

 

Here’s a short list of religious groups it wouldn’t dream of baiting: Unitarians, Presbyterians, members of any liberal, Protestant denomination, Cafeteria Catholics, Reform Jews, Buddhists, Wiccans and Moslems.

 

Why are traditional Catholics, evangelicals and – to a lesser extent – Orthodox Jews, considered fair game?

 

Because the Hollywood Left (in other words, 98 percent of the self-styled artistic community) views them as the enemy.

 

Hollywood hates authentic Christians, because Christianity is diametrically opposed to its worldview – a dogma reflected in the very deep thoughts of Michael Moore, Tim Robbins and Barbara Streisand. It's based on the following tenets:

 

 

1) Sexual Liberation – the glorification of pre-marital sex (including adolescent experimentation), adultery, homosexuality, abortion and the sexualization of children. This may be contrasted with the Judeo-Christian ethic of sexual restraint/responsibility, and the sanctification of sex within marriage (raising the carnal to a spiritual plane).

 

2) A Live-for-the-Moment Ethos – the here-and-now is all there is, or as the beer commercial used to put it, "You only go around once; so grab all the gusto you can." This is opposed to the Christian emphasis on life eternal. Christians and religious Jews live not for the moment but for eternity. Hollywood’s seize-the-moment ethic must ultimately lead to a total rejection of the Ten Commandments and all biblical morality.

 

3) The Cult of Self – or to put it in the lingo of pop psychology: "self-actualization," really self-gratification. From this perspective, putting anything ahead of your own happiness is dumb, if not psychotic. Christianity and Judaism both teach that your life isn’t your own. It belongs to the One who gave you life.

 

4) Gender Sameness – the bizarre and amply refuted doctrine that men and women are psychologically identical, that gender roles are socially imposed, instead of reality-based. This dogma lies at the heart of liberalism’s push to radically remake the family. The worse invective the Left can hurl at the family (from its perspective) is "patriarchal" and "male-dominated."

 

5) Militant Secularism – the belief that religious expression should be confined to a white clapboard building, and that traditional faith should play no role in shaping our laws and institutions. Thus, someone who speaks of rights being "endowed by their Creator" (like the Founding Fathers) or saying that America is a nation "under God" (like Abraham Lincoln) becomes an enemy of democracy.

 

 

What really enrages the Hollywood Left is the realization that, more than any other group in our society, evangelical Christians – who now constitute the nation's largest identifiable voting bloc – stand in the way of its political agenda: abortion on demand, a contraceptive culture, erotic indoctrination masquerading as sex education, universal day care (the literal Nanny State), the complete public blessing of gay marriage and hate-crimes legislation that criminalizes religious speech. By attacking Christians, Hollywood is advancing its agenda.

 

Over the past 40 years, Hollywood has been primarily responsible for the rapid degeneration of our culture. Modern cinema is filled with violence, sadism, sex at its most animalistic, crudeness, nihilism and despair. If Hollywood wants to treat Christianity as the antithesis of all it holds dear, Christians should feel complimented.

 

The two most powerful molders of opinion in the nation, the media and Hollywood, are at the head of the line in the war on Christianity, frequently ridiculing and disparaging Christians in ways they would never dream of employing against any other group of Americans.

 

The media, portrays Christians as unreasonable and violent, charging them with violent acts against abortionists, abortion clinics or homosexuals while at the same time both Hollywood and the media downplay injustices and violent acts committed against Christians.

 

A favorite media tactic is the use of the term "religious right" to describe Christian conservatives, implying such believers are, "intolerant, backwoods fanatics, and yet never labeling religious liberals such as Jesse Jackson, as the ‘religious left’ or other leftists as the ‘anti-religious left."

 

Here are other examples of this tactic.....

 

# Bryant Gumbel in a June, 2000 CBS "Early Show" interviewing Robert Knight of the Family Research Council appearing to defend the Boy Scouts refusal to allow homosexuals to be Scout leaders, thinking the mike was off, muttered that Knight was "a f***ing idiot."

 

# CNN founder Ted Turner asked employees who had ashes on their foreheads on Ash Wednesday if they were "a bunch of Jesus freaks?"

 

# In his book "Bias" Bernard Goldberg reported that CBS producer Roxanne Russell called Christian activist and then-presidential candidate Gary Bauer "the little nut from the Christian group."

 

# Christians have been called "the American Taliban, with one reporter for a Florida newspaper, Bob Norman referring to "evangelical loonies," and "way-out-there Christian whacks." In the St. Petersburg Times columnist Robyn E. Blummer wrote that the "religious right" is trying in "Taliban-like ways to inject religion into public schools and the operations of government."

 

One of the more outrageous examples of anti-Christian ranting was exhibited on the liberal taxpayer funded National Public Radio (NPR). On January 22, 2002, NPR reporter David Kestenbaum "seemed to imply," that the Traditional Values Coalition (TVC), a pro-family ministry was involved in the terrorist anthrax attacks on the nation’s capital.

 

One of the more current cases of extreme media bias has been the handling of the controversy surrounding Mel Gibson’s film, The Passion" which tells the story of Jesus Christ’s final 12 hours.

 

Although the film is solid based on the four Gospels of Matthew, Mark, Luke and John – Gospels that have been accepted as the true narrative of Christ’s passion and death from the very beginnings of Christianity – Gibson was attacked for promoting anti-Semitism.

 

What do we need to do?

 

We need to listen, we need to pay attention.

 

1 Chr. 12:32 “......men of Issachar, who understood the times and knew what Israel should do....”

 

Don’t try to be a “closet Christian.”

 

Speak up!

 

Pr. 31:8 “Speak up for those who cannot speak for themselves,

for the rights of all who are destitute.

9 Speak up and judge fairly;

defend the rights of the poor and needy.”

 

We need to speak, call, write....

The example of “Hope Clinic.”  We need to do what we can.

 

Pr. 24:11 Rescue those being led away to death; hold back those staggering toward slaughter.

12 If you say, “But we knew nothing about this,” does not he who weighs the heart perceive it? Does not he who guards your life know it?

Will he not repay each person according to what he has done?

 

 

Web Space donated by LocalLink